Eficacia y seguridad de la vacuna contra el dengue / Efficacy and safety of dengue vaccine

El dengue es un problema creciente para la salud pública mundial. En Argentina, los casos se han ido incrementado en los últimos años. La vacuna Dengvaxia (CYD-TDV) fue aprobada por la Agencia Nacional de Medicamentos, Alimentos y Tecnología (ANMAT) en 2017, y actualmente está indicada para personas entre los 9 y 45 años de edad que residan enzonas endémicas. A partir de la consulta de una paciente sobre la posibilidad de vacunarse contra el dengue, la autora se plantea la pertinencia de su indicación, teniendo en cuenta la eficacia y seguridad de la vacuna. Luego de una búsqueda rápida se encontró evidencia que señala que la vacuna contra el dengue CYD-TDV mostró poca eficacia en comparación con otras vacunas disponibles en el mercado, siendo más segura y eficaz en personas que ya han sido infectadas anteriormente por el virus del dengue (sujetos seropositivos). En cambio, se observó un aumento del riesgo de dengue grave en los infectados por vez primera tras la vacunación (sujetos seronegativos). Se concluye que la estrategia recomendada consiste en vacunar únicamente a las personas que hayan tenido infección por dengue con anterioridad, consistiendo en una buena práctica la toma de decisiones compartidas con cada paciente. (AU)

Dengue is a growing problem for global public health. In Argentina, cases have been increasing in recent years. The Dengvaxia vaccine (CYD-TDV) was approved by the National Agency for Medicines, Food and Technology in 2017, and it is currently indicated for people between 9 and 45 years of age who reside in endemic areas. Based on the consultation of a patient about the possibility of being vaccinated against dengue, the author considers the relevance of its indication, taking into account the efficacy and safety of the vaccine. After a quick search, evidence was found that indicates that the CYD-TDV dengue vaccine showed little efficacy compared to other vaccines available on the market, being safer and more effective in people who have already been previously infected by the dengue virus (seropositive subjects). In contrast, an increased risk of severe dengue was observed in those infected for the first time after vaccination (seronegative subjects). It is concluded that the recommended strategy consists of vaccinating only people who have had dengue infection before, making shared decisions with each patient a good practice. (AU)

Epitope of dengue virus E protein detect human antibodies associated with mild disease: a potential peptide for vaccine development

ABSTRACT The antigenic potential of seven immunogenic peptides of the dengue virus was evaluated in the sera of patients with dengue confirmed by IgM/IgG serology. Antibodies IgM and IgG against dengue virus peptides were analyzed by ELISA in 31 dengue sero-positive and 20 sero-negative patients. The P5 peptide showed significant IgG immunoreactivity mostly in the sera of patients with dengue without warning signs in comparison with patients with dengue with warning signs, correlating with mild disease. This finding suggests that the low antibody response against P5 epitope could be a risk factor for higher susceptibility to dengue virus infection with warning signs, and that P5 could be a potential antigen for vaccine development.

Parental perception and attitude on childhood immunization and other government healthcare programs after the Dengue vaccine controversy: a hospital-based cross-sectional study

@#<p><strong>BACKGROUND:</strong> The dengue vaccine controversy in the Philippines caused significant public anxiety affecting childhood vaccines, as well as other healthcare programs. An assessment of parental perception and attitude on childhood immunization and other government healthcare programs after the dengue vaccine controversy is lacking</p><p><strong>OBJECTIVE:</strong> To determine the perception and attitude of parents on childhood immunization and other government health care programs after the dengue vaccine controversy at a tertiary pediatric hospital.</p><p><strong>METHODOLOGY:</strong> A hospital-based cross-sectional survey was done at a tertiary pediatric hospital. A total of 96 subjects participated in the study. Parents with children ages 9 to 18 years old whose child was either vaccinated or non-vaccinated with dengue vaccine seen in the dengue clinic, outpatient department and private clinics were invited to answer the structured questionnaire. Proportional stratified sampling was employed. Mann Whitney U-test compared the perception and attitude scores between parents of children who were recipients and non-recipients of dengue vaccine. A p-value of</p><p><strong>RESULTS:</strong> The overall perception and attitude of parents on childhood immunization, deworming and vitamin A supplementation did not differ significantly between parents of non-dengue vaccinated children and dengue-vaccinated children. Sociodemographic factors such as gender, marital status, educational attainment, employment, and economic status did not differ significantly in their perception and attitude in terms of childhood immunization, deworming and vitamin A supplementation.</p><p><strong>CONCLUSIONS:</strong> The overall perception and attitude of parents in both groups showed no significant difference toward childhood immunization, deworming and vitamin A supplementation. There is no association with the overall perception and attitude of parents on childhood immunization, deworming and vitamin A supplementation and their sociodemographic factors. RECOMMENDATIONS: Future similar studies may be conducted in other regions to determine parental perception and attitude towards the government's immunization program and other health care programs.</p>

Eficacia y seguridad de la vacuna contra dengue / Efficacy and safety of the dengue vaccine

El artículo describe la evidencia científica disponible sobre la eficacia y seguridad de la vacuna contra dengue.

Dengue, zika, chikungunya y el desarrollo de vacunas / Dengue, zika, chikungunya and the development of vaccines

Dengue (DENV), zika (ZIKV) y chikungunya (CHIKV), tres arbovirosis transmitidas por mosquitos Aedes, se han propagado en las últimas décadas en zonas tropicales y subtropicales húmedas. El dengue es epidémico en áreas subtropicales de la Argentina. Después de la infección por DENV hay inmunidad duradera contra el serotipo infectante, pero aumenta el riesgo de enfermedad grave por los otros tres. La vacuna recombinante tetravalente, Dengvaxia® previene el dengue grave y la hospitalización en sujetos seropositivos. En 2017 se aprobó Dengvaxia en Argentina, para edades de 9 a 45 años, sin incluirla en el calendario nacional de vacunación. Otras dos vacunas se hallan en evaluación Fase III: la desarrollada por NIAID/ Instituto Butantan y la vacuna Takeda. ZIKV, virus asociado a microcefalia en recién nacidos en Brasil, circula desde 2016 en Argentina. Aún no existe vacuna de actividad comprobada contra ZIKV ni tratamiento eficaz. No se registró circulación activa de CHIKV en Argentina en 2017. Los brotes de fiebre CHIKV tienen una complicación: el desarrollo de reumatismo crónico post-enfermedad. No existen vacunas aprobadas para humanos ni terapias antivirales efectivas. La gravedad de estas virosis contribuyó a un rápido progreso en el conocimiento de los procesos de infección y de la respuesta inmune. Pero sus vectores, Aedes aegypti y A. albopictus, continúan expandiéndose, lo que indica que la vacuna será el medio más efectivo para el control. Se resume aquí información sobre estas arbovirosis en Argentina y Brasil, y se describen avances en el desarrollo y la evaluación de vacunas.

Dengue (DENV), zika (ZIKV) and chikungunya (CHIKV), three arbovirosis transmitted by Aedes mosquitoes, have spread in recent decades in humid tropical and subtropical zones. Dengue is epidemic in subtropical areas of Argentina. DENV infection confers lasting immunity against the infecting serotype but increases the risk of serious disease upon reinfection by any of the other three. The recombinant tetravalent vaccine Dengvaxia® prevents severe dengue and hospitalization in seropositive subjects. In 2017, Dengvaxia was approved in Argentina, for ages 9 to 45, but is not included in the national vaccination calendar. Two other vaccines are in Phase III evaluation: one developed by NIAID / Instituto Butantan and the other by Takeda.ZIKV, a virus associated with microcephaly in newborns in Brazil, circulates since 2016 in Argentina. There is still not effective treatment nor vaccine with proven activity against ZIKV. There has been no active circulation of CHIKV in Argentina in 2017. Outbreaks of CHIKV fever have a complication: the development of chronic post-disease rheumatism. There are not approved vaccines for humans nor effective antiviral therapies. The seriousness of these virosis has contributed to a rapid progress in the knowledge of the infection processes and the immune response. For now, Aedes aegypti and A. albopictus vectors continue to expand, suggesting that the vaccine will be the most effective means of controlling these viruses. Here we summarize information about these arbovirosis in Argentina and Brazil and describe advances in the development and evaluation of vaccines.

Dengue vaccine acceptance and associated factors among parents and caregivers at the Philippine Children’s Medical Center outpatient department: A hospital-based cross-sectional survey

BACKGROUND@#The DOH has recently launched the first ever dengue vaccine that has successfully completed phase III clinical trials but an assessment of the general acceptance of the vaccine is widely lacking. @*OBJECTIVES@# This study determined the dengue vaccine acceptance and the factors associated with acceptance as well as the knowledge, attitudes and practices on dengue fever among parents and caregivers at the PCMC-OPD.@*METHODS@#A hospital-based cross-sectional survey was done at the PCMC-OPD using selfadministered questionnaires regarding the KAP on dengue fever and vaccine acceptance. Multivariate analysis and Spearman’s rank correlation were used to determine predictors of DV acceptance.@*RESULTS@#We found that DV acceptance among the participants was 81.3% (113 out of 139). Educational attainment, employment status, and monthly income are significantly associated with acceptance of dengue vaccine, and being female contributed to high acceptance. DV acceptance was strongly correlated with a lower income class. Educational attainment and employment status seem to affect DV acceptance but are not strong predictors.@*CONCLUSIONS@#The DV acceptance rate of the parents and caregivers of patients consulting at PCMC-OPD was high. The most important factors associated with acceptance are educational attainment, employment status and income class.@*RECOMMENDATIONS@#A similar study may be conducted with a larger population to study target populations in the Philippines. This kind of study can be utilized to formulate new strategies addressing the awareness and acceptance of the community for the new dengue vaccine.

Enfermedad por virus Dengue: su prevención / Dengue disease: its prevention

El Dengue al igual que el zika y el chikungunya son enfermedades trasmitidas por vectores Más del 80% de la población mundial vive en zonas de riesgo de contraer al menos una de estas enfermedades. El dengue es transmitido por la picadura del mosquito hembra vector del género Aedes, especie A. aegypti que circula con mayor frecuencia en las Américas. La carga de enfermedad por dengue es sin duda un problema global que afecta a gran parte de la población mundial y el número de casos se ha incrementado considerablemente en los últimos 50 años. El período de incubación de la enfermedad varía de 3 a 15 días con una media de 4 a 6 días pero existe una gran proporción de casos asintomáticos estimada en alrededor del 75%.1 Las intervenciones de control de vectores ofrecen uno de los mejores rendimientos de inversiones en el ámbito de la salud pública. Los programas eficaces de control de vectores que reducen enfermedades pueden impulsar el desarrollo humano y económico. Actualmente se encuentran en desarrollo 4 vacunas para controlar esta enfermedad y una vacuna ya se encuentra aprobada en algunos países del mundo, fundamentalmente indicada para sujetos con infección previa por Dengue

Dengue as well as Zika and Chikungunya are diseases transmitted by vectors. More than 80% of the world population lives in areas at risk of contracting at least one of these diseases. Dengue is transmitted by the female vector mosquito of the genus Aedes species A. Aegypti, which circulates most frequently in the Americas. The burden of Dengue disease is undoubtedly a global problem that affects a large part of the world population and the number of cases has increased considerably in the last 50 years. The incubation period of the disease varies from 3 to 15 days with an average of 4-6 days, but there is a large proportion of asymptomatic cases, estimated to be around 75%. Vector control interventions offer one of the best investment returns in the field of public health. Effective vector control programs that reduce diseases can boost human and economic development. At present, 4 vaccines are being developed to control this disease and one vaccine has been approved in some countries, mainly indicated for subjects previously infected with Dengue

Razones para recomendar la vacunación contra el dengue en Isla de Pascua: Opinión del Comité de Inmunizaciones de la Sociedad Chilena de Infectología / Reasons to recommend vaccination against dengue in Easter Island: Immunization Advisory Committee of Sociedad Chilena de Infectología

Dengue was first diagnosed on Easter Island on year 2002 and thereafter recurrent outbreaks have occurred involving different serotypes of dengue virus. Its vector, Aedes aegypti has not been eliminated despite the small size of the island. Conditions at the local hospital preclude adequate management of severe and hemorrhagic cases due to the absence of a Critical Care Unit as well as no availability of platelets, or plasma units for transfusion. Besides, transfer, of severely affected patients to continental Chile is cumbersome, slow and expensive. In this scenario, it is advisable to implement selective vaccination of Easter Island habitants with an available quadrivalent attenuated dengue vaccine with the aim to reduce hemorrhagic and severe dengue cases. This strategy should not replace permanent efforts to control waste disposal sites, water sources, maintain vector surveillance and increase education of the population.

El dengue surgió el año 2002 en Isla de Pascua y se ha presentado en brotes intercurrentes desde entonces con aparición de diferentes serotipos. El vector Aedes aegypti no ha logrado ser eliminado a pesar del pequeño tamaño de la isla y las condiciones del hospital local no permiten el manejo de casos graves por ausencia de una unidad de cuidados intensivos y disponibilidad de transfusiones de plaquetas o plasma fresco congelado. Además, el traslado de pacientes graves hacia el continente no es inmediato y es muy costoso. En este escenario, es aconsejable vacunar selectivamente a la población residente con la vacuna cuadrivalente atenuada para disminuir la probabilidad de dengue grave. Esta estrategia no debe reemplazar los esfuerzos para el control de basurales, fuentes de agua, vigilancia del vector y educación de la población.

Las vacunas contra el dengue ¿una realidad para la Argentina? / Dengue vaccines. A reality for Argentina?

Los brotes de dengue se suceden anualmente en Argentina desde el año 1998. Existen vacunas contra esta enfermedad en distintos grados de desarrollo que han sido probadas en países endémicos. La más avanzada hasta el momento fue autorizada para su comercialización en tres países de América Latina, para niños mayores de 9 años. En este artículo se discuten los beneficios e inconvenientes de las vacunas, así como los desafíos para la implementación de una estrategia de vacunación. Asimismo, se plantea la necesidad de una estratificación de riesgo con nuevos criterios y visión multidisciplinaria como un camino posible para evaluar la pertinencia de un programa de vacunación en las áreas con mayor riesgo de transmisión, y/o en individuos con mayor riesgo de dengue grave. Se sugiere también que la definición del estatus de endemicidad debe tomar en cuenta a las realidades locales. Por último, este artículo propone una discusión amplia de las evidencias, impacto esperado y aspectos instrumentales que estarían involucrados en la incorporación de una vacuna contra el dengue, ya en mercado o en desarrollo, en el programa nacional de inmunizaciones, y especialmente a qué subpoblaciones debería ser dirigida para que la estrategia de inmunización sea costo-efectiva.

Dengue outbreaks have occurred yearly in Argentina since 1998. A number of candidate vaccines have been tested in endemic countries. The most advanced one was licensed in three countries of Latin America for children over 9 years of age. In the present article the benefits and drawbacks of these vaccines as well as the challenges for the implementation of a vaccination strategy in Argentina are discussed. Furthermore, a risk stratification strategy with new criteria and a multidisciplinary vision is suggested as a possible path for the assessment of the pertinence of a vaccination program in areas showing the highest risk of dengue transmission and/or for people at the greatest risk of developing severe dengue. It is also suggested that the definition regarding the status of endemicity should take into account the local realities. Finally, this paper proposes a broad discussion on the evidences, the expected impact and instrumental aspects that would be involved in the incorporation of a dengue vaccine, marketed or in development, into the national immunization program, and especially which subpopulation should be targeted for the immunization strategy to be cost-effective.

Dengue, Zika y Chikungunya / Dengue, Zika y Chikungunya

Los responsables de la actual pandemia de Chikungunya (alfavirus), dengue y Zika (flavivirus) son virus trasmitidos por artrópodos, arbovirus. Su importancia aumentó en las Américas en los últimos 20 años. Los vectores principales son Aedes aegypti y A. albopictus. La infección por dengue provee inmunidad duradera al serotipo específico y temporaria a otros tres. La posterior infección por otro serotipo determina mayor gravedad. Existe una vacuna contra dengue registrada, Dengvaxia (Sanofi Pasteur). Otras dos (Butantan y Takeda) comienzan la Fase III en 2016. La infección por Zika suele ser asintomática, o presentarse con exantema, conjuntivitis y fiebre no muy elevada. No existen vacunas ni tratamiento específico. Se puede transmitir por vía parental, sexual y por transfusión sanguínea. Se la ha asociado con microcefalia. Chikungunya causa artralgias prolongadas, con respuesta inmune persistente. Hay dos vacunas candidatas en Fase II. El diagnóstico directo del dengue se realiza por cultivo, RT-PCR y ELISA para detección del antígeno NS1; los métodos indirectos son ELISA-IgM (reacción cruzada con otros flavivirus), MAC-ELISA, y neutralización en placas, que diferencia los 4 serotipos DENV y otros flavivirus. Zika se diagnostica por RT-PCR y aislamiento del virus. El diagnóstico serológico presenta reacciones cruzadas con otros flavivirus. Para CHIKV se emplean cultivo y RT-PCR, MAC-ELISA y neutralización en placas. Contra Aedes se emplean larvicidas organofosforados (temefos), insecticidas organofosforados (malation y fenitrotion) y piretroides (permetrina y deltametrina). Puede haber resistencia. Los derivados vegetales son menos costosos y biodegradables, entre ellos el aceite de cetronela, que microencapsulado se preserva de la evaporación.

Arboviruses are transmitted by arthropods, including those responsible for the current pandemic: alphavirus (Chikungunya) and flaviviruses (dengue and Zika). Its importance increased in the Americas over the past 20 years. The main vectors are Aedes aegypti and A. albopictus. Dengue infection provides long lasting immunity against the specific serotype and temporary to the other three. Subsequent infection by another serotype determines more serious disease. There is a registered vaccine for dengue, Dengvaxia (Sanofi Pasteur). Other two (Butantan and Takeda) are in Phase III in 2016. Zika infection is usually asymptomatic or occurs with rash, conjunctivitis and not very high fever. There is no vaccine or specific treatment. It can be transmitted by parental, sexual and via blood transfusion. It has been associated with microcephaly. Chikungunya causes prolonged joint pain and persistent immune response. Two candidate vaccines are in Phase II. Dengue direct diagnosis is performed by virus isolation, RT-PCR and ELISA for NS1 antigen detection; indirect methods are ELISA-IgM (cross-reacting with other flavivirus), MAC-ELISA, and plaque neutralization. Zika is diagnosed by RT-PCR and virus isolation. Serological diagnosis cross-reacts with other flavivirus. For CHIKV culture, RT-PCR, MAC-ELISA and plaque neutralization are used. Against Aedes organophosphate larvicides (temephos), organophosphorus insecticides (malathion and fenitrothion) and pyrethroids (permethrin and deltamethrin) are usually employed. Resistance has been described to all these products. Vegetable derivatives are less expensive and biodegradable, including citronella oil, which microencapsulated can be preserved from evaporation.

Análisis de la evidencia sobre eficacia y seguridad de la vacuna de dengue CYD-TDV y su potencial registro e implementación en el Programa de Vacunación Universal de México / Analysis of the evidence on the efficacy and safety of CYD-TDV dengue vaccine and its potential licensing and implementation through Mexico's Universal Vaccination Program

El dengue es un importante problema de salud pública global, que afecta a América Latina y México. Las medidas de prevención y control centradas en vigilancia epidemiológica y control de vectores han resultado parcialmente efectivas y costosas, por lo que el desarrollo de una vacuna contra el dengue ha creado grandes expectativas entre las autoridades sanitarias y las comunidades científicas en el mundo. Sólo la vacuna CYD-TDV, producida por Sanofi-Pasteur, ha sido evaluada en ensayos clínicos controlados fase 3. No obstante a pesar de la importante contribución que esto significa para el desarrollo de una vacuna contra el dengue, los tres estudios clínicos fase 3 de CYD-TDV y el metaanálisis de seguimiento a largo plazo derivado de los mismos proporcionan evidencia de que esta vacuna tiene una eficacia parcial para proteger contra dengue virológicamente confirmado. Al respecto, surgen cuatro consideraciones: a) eficacia adecuada contra infecciones por virus de dengue (DENV) 3 y 4, menor eficacia contra infecciones por DENV 1 y prácticamente nula protección contra infecciones por DENV 2; b) disminución de la eficacia en individuos seronegativos a dengue al inicio de la vacunación; c) 83 y 90% de protección contra hospitalizaciones y formas de dengue grave, respectivamente, a 25 meses de seguimiento, y d) incremento de hospitalización por dengue, en el grupo de vacunados, en niños menores de nueve años de edad al momento de la vacunación, detectado a partir del tercer año de seguimiento. El beneficio de la vacuna CYD-TDV se puede resumir en la protección contra infecciones por DENV 3 y 4, así como en la protección de hospitalizaciones y casos graves en individuos mayores de nueve años y en quienes han tenido infección previa por dengue, pues funciona principalmente como una vacuna de refuerzo. En esta revisión se identificaron elementos sobre eficacia y seguridad de esta vacuna que deben ser tomados en cuenta ante el potencial registro e inclusión en el programa de vacunación en la población mexicana. La evidencia científica disponible sobre la vacuna CYD-TDV demuestra méritos, pero también da lugar a preguntas relevantes que deberían ser contestadas para evaluar apropiadamente el perfil de seguridad del producto, así como las poblaciones blanco de potencial beneficio. Al respecto, consideramos que sería informativo completar el seguimiento indicado de seis años después de iniciar la vacunación, de acuerdo con el protocolo propuesto en los propios estudios del fabricante como una recomendación de la Organización Mundial de la Salud. Al igual que con cualquier nueva vacuna, el potencial registro e implementación de uso de CYD-TDV en el programa nacional de vacunación de México requiere una definición clara de cuál es el balance entre los beneficios y riesgos esperados. En particular, ante una vacuna con eficacia variable y algunas señales de riesgo, en caso de aprobar el registro, se deben desarrollar protocolos de manejo de riesgos detallados que permitan identificar de manera oportuna cualquier evento de salud asociado con la vacunación.

Dengue is a major global public health problem affecting Latin America and Mexico Prevention and control measures, focusing on epidemiological surveillance and vector control, have been partially effective and costly, thus, the development of a vaccine against dengue has created great expectations among health authorities and scientific communities worldwide. The CYD-TDV dengue vaccine produced by Sanofi-Pasteur is the only dengue vaccine evaluated in phase 3 controlled clinical trials. Notwithstanding the significant contribution to the development of a vaccine against dengue, the three phase 3 clinical studies of CYD-TDV and the meta-analysis of the long-term follow up of those studies, have provided evidence that this vaccine exhibited partial vaccine efficacy to protect against virologically confirmed dengue and lead to four considerations: a) adequate vaccine efficacy against dengue virus (DENV) infections 3 and 4, less vaccine efficacy against DENV 1 and no protection against infection by DENV 2; b) decreased vaccine efficacy in dengue seronegative individuals at the beginning of the vaccination; c) 83% and 90% protection against hospitalizations and severe forms of dengue, respectively, at 25 months follow-up; and d) increased hospitalization for dengue in the vaccinated group, in children under nine years of age at the time of vaccination, detected since the third year of follow-up. The benefit of the CYD-TDV vaccine can be summarized in the protection against infection by DENV 3 and 4, as well as protection for hospitalizations and severe cases in people over nine years, who have had previous dengue infection, working mainly as a booster. In this review we identified elements on efficacy and safety of this vaccine that must be taken into account in the licensing process and potential inclusion in the national vaccination program of Mexico. The available scientific evidence on the CYD-TDV vaccine shows merits, but also leads to relevant questions that should be answered to properly assess the safety profile of the product and the target populations of potential benefit. In this regard we consider it would be informative to complete the 6-year follow-up after starting vaccination, according to the company's own study protocol recommended by the World Health Organization. As with any new vaccine, the potential licensing and implementation of the CYD-TDV as part of Mexico's vaccination program, requires a clear definition of the balance between the expected benefits and risks. Particularly with a vaccine with variable efficacy and some signs of risk, in the probable case of licensing, the post-licensed period must involve the development of detailed protocols to immediately identify risks or any health event associated with vaccination.

SAGE recommends introduction of dengue vaccine in geographic set-tings with high endemicity

The Strategic Advisory Group of Experts [SAGE] on immunization recently reviewed the evidence generated from two large Phase 3 clinical trials, one conducted in Asia and the other in Latin America. On the basis of currently available evidence, SAGE recommended that the countries may consider introduction of dengue vaccine [CYD-TDV] only in in geographic settings with high endemicity [seroprevalence is greater than 70% or more in targeted age group or other suitable epidemiologic marker]

Prospects for dengue vaccines for travelers

Travel-acquired dengue cases have been increasing as the overall global dengue burden has expanded. In Korea, imported dengue cases have been reported since 2000 when it first became a notifiable disease. During the first four months of 2016, three times more dengue cases were reported in Korea than during the same period the previous year. A safe and efficacious vaccine for travelers would be beneficial to prevent dengue disease in individual travelers and potentially decrease the risk of virus spread to non-endemic areas. Here, we summarize the characteristics of dengue vaccines for travelers and review dengue vaccines currently licensed or in clinical development.

Dengue vaccines: what we know, what has been done, but what does the future hold? / Vacinas contra a dengue: o que sabemos, o que tem sido feito, mas o que nos reserva o futuro?

Dengue, a disease caused by any of the four serotypes of dengue viruses, is the most important arthropod-borne viral disease in the world in terms of both morbidity and mortality. The infection by these viruses induces a plethora of clinical manifestations ranging from asymptomatic infections to severe diseases with involvement of several organs. Severe forms of the disease are more frequent in secondary infections by distinct serotypes and, consequently, a dengue vaccine must be tetravalent. Although several approaches have been used on the vaccine development, no vaccine is available against these viruses, especially because of problems on the development of a tetravalent vaccine. Here, we describe briefly the vaccine candidates available and their ability to elicit a protective immune response. We also discuss the problems and possibilities of any of the vaccines in final development stage reaching the market for human use.

Dengue, doença causada por qualquer um dos quatro sorotipos dos vírus dengue, é atualmente a mais importante doença viral transmitida por artrópodos em todo o mundo, tanto em termos de morbidade como de mortalidade. A infecção por estes vírus causa grande variedade de manifestações clínicas, desde infecções assintomáticas até doenças graves com envolvimento de diversos órgãos. As formas graves da dengue são mais frequentes em infecções secundárias por sorotipos diferentes e, por esta razão, a vacina contra a dengue deve ser tetravalente. Embora várias estratégias tenham sido usadas no desenvolvimento de vacinas contra a dengue, não há ainda nenhuma vacina disponível, particularmente por problemas no desenvolvimento de uma vacina tetravalente. Aqui, descreve-se brevemente os candidatos vacinais disponíveis e a capacidade de eles induzirem resposta imune protetora contra novas infecções. Ainda, discutimos os problemas e as possibilidades de liberação, para uso em seres humanos, de qualquer uma das vacinas em fase final de desenvolvimento

Descriptive Review of Safety, Reactogenicity and Immunogenicity of Dengue Vaccine Clinical Trials, 2003 –2013

Dengue vaccine development has been one of the strategies to reduce dengue incidence in the world alongside with other horizontal interventions such as vector control and the transgenic mosquito programmes. The objective of this paper is to evaluate the safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity of dengue vaccine clinical trials for the last ten years systematically through a descriptive review. This paper discusses safety issues like adverse events, systemic adverse reactions, injection site reactions, viraemia, morbidity and mortality as well as immunogenicity which measures effectiveness through mean geometric titre and seropositive rates. Adverse events were seen to range from 0% to 28.3%. Immunogenicity was noted to increase post 1st and 2nd dose and decrease post 3rd dose. The seropositivity at baseline ranged between 53.1% and 97.8% at post 3rd dose, and it was 88.5% for at least four serotypes. The dengue vaccine studies that were reviewed were shown to be relatively safe with low reactogenicity, however the immunogenicity was unequal and waning. The immunogenicity waned post 3rd dose showing a decrease in all serotypes of varying degrees although the seropositivity, on average, at post 3rd dose was 97.8%. It can be concluded that dengue vaccine development would require further studies on its unequal and waning immunogenicity, which could result in a more severe form of dengue following wild infection, during re-immunisation, especially if there is variation in the circulating virus.

Research progress in the structure and function of dengue virus non-structural 1 protein / 病毒学报

Dengue virus (DENV) is a re-emerging disease transmitted by the Aedes mosquitoes and has become a major public health problem in southern China. Currently, no antiviral drug or effective vaccine exist to control this disease. The chimeric DENV structural protein vaccine cannot elicit balanced levels of protective immunity to each of the four viral serotypes; therefore, non-structural protein components may be required to construct an effective DENV vaccine. The Dengue virus non-structural 1 (DENV NS1) protein plays a critical role in viral pathogenesis and protective immunity. Therefore, immunity to Dengue 1-4 NS1 subtypes may be crucial for the prevention of severe disease. This review attempts to provide an overview about the structure and function of DENV NS1.

Clinical implications and treatment of dengue

Dengue is a common pathogenic disease often proving fatal, more commonly affecting the tropics. Aedes mosquito is the vector for this disease, and outbreaks of dengue often cause mass damage to life. The current review is an effort to present an insight into the causes, etiology, symptoms, transmission, diagnosis, major organs affected, mitigation and line of treatment of this disease with special emphasis on drugs of natural origin. The disease has a potential to spread as an endemic, often claiming several lives and thus requires concerted efforts to work out better treatment options. Traditional medicine offers an alternative solution and could be explored as a safer treatment option. Development of a successful vaccine and immunization technique largely remains a challenge and a better antiviral approach needs to be worked out to complement the supportive therapy. No single synthetic molecule has found to be wholly effective enough to offer curative control and the line of treatment mostly utilizes a combination of fluid replacement and antipyretics-analgesics like molecules to provide symptomatic relief.